Post by Salvador AstuciaPost by An Innocent DoormanSo, now it's a bunch of people and not just some "Zekelo" :-)
The person who posted the hateful comments about me is reportedly
named Samuel Goldschmidt from NYC. I assume you are another one of Mr.
Goldschmidt's creations.
Are you sure? Do you have any factual evidence?
Post by Salvador AstuciaMany people know him (you) as Gerry Zekelo. He is part of a huge
propaganda/spy network whose mission is to keep the public in the dark
about John Lennon's murder and other important topics.
I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together.
How huge network it is? Is it bigger than life?
The public has known the truth about John Lennon's murder for 25+ years.
Join the public!
As long as you keep on pushing lies there will always be someone to
remind you about it. If someone gets bored with you, someone else will
take over. So, don't get lost while chasing after Zekelo. Chase the
moon, now that you're already howling at the moon.
Post by Salvador AstuciaPost by An Innocent DoormanRepeatedly accusing an innocent person for killing John Lennon is not
discussion.
Previously, I asked: "Do you know Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo
personally? If so, why don't you provide some information to clear his
name, rather than attacking me for asking questions."
Post by An Innocent DoormanThere is no factual evidence that the doorman Jose Perdomo was Sanjenis
Perdomo. You've taken the picture of Jose Hipolito Bacallao Perdomo out
of context and you're displaying it as the picture of Jose Joaquin
Sanjenis Perdomo. You're only link between the doorman Jose Perdomo and
Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo is the picture Jose Hipolito Bacallao
Perdomo. You don't even have any factual evidence to prove that the
doorman Jose Perdomo is Bacallao Perdomo. You have nothing but
speculations by you and other conspiracy hobbyists. Yet you're openly
stating that Jose Perdomo is the real killer. Go back to square one and
start all over again.
You're preaching to the choir. I have the following statement
underneath all captions of a photo of Jose Perdomo (dated 1960) on my
website, which is consistent with your statement about Jose Hipolito
"Jose Perdomo as he looked around 1960. This photograph was shown in
the Cuban Information Archives website; however, there were multiple
people listed as Jose Perdomo on that site. About a year ago, this
author was advised by researcher James Richards (via email) that the
stated multiple listings of Perdomo were actually the same person.
Richards further claimed that this photo was in fact Jose Joaquin
Sanjenis Perdomo, Cuban spy and professional assassin."
Somebody's email is hardly an evidence of anything. It's just an
opinion. And in this case, an opinion of another conspiracy hobbyist.
James Richards couldn't provide you with any evidence, because he had
none. You're in square one. No factual evidence whatsoever.
Two years ago you wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.beatles/browse_thread/thread/4513ddfa4655a987
-------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Salvador Astucia
Subject: Re: Sanjenis cover-up
Date: 22 Jan 2005 13:09:02 -0800
Were these two Jose Perdomos the same person?
If anyone has hard legal evidence that these were
two individuals were the same person, or different
people, I would like to see it. Either way,
it's important information.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Dejavu all over again" - John Fogerty.
Well, I would like to see that hard legal evidence, too :-) Have you got
it by now? James Richards' personal beliefs don't account. Have you
verified James Richards' opinion in any way? No you haven't. You jump to
conclusions and then you jump to present your conclusions in newsgroups.
Post by Salvador AstuciaI have made several attempts to gather information about Jose Perdomo,
the security guard (or doorman) at the Dakota when Lennon was murdered
on Dec. 8, 1980. First, Perdomo's name was concealed from the public
for approximately six years. Accused killer Mark David Chapman himself
revealed Perdomo's name in a 1987 interview with Jim Gaines, former
editor with People Magazine. Chapman told Gaines that Perdomo was an
anti-Castro Cuban exile and they (Chapman and Perdomo) discussed the
CIA's failed Bay of Pigs Invasion (1961) and JFK's assassination
outside the Dakota just hours before Lennon was killed.
Nothing that you write here proves that the doorman was either Bacallao
Perdomo or Sanjenis Perdomo. He could just as well be any other Jose
Perdomo. All Cuban exiles are anti-Castro (except Cuban spies). The Bay
of Pigs Invasion is a very common topic to discuss with a Cuban exile
and when discussed one can't avoid discussing JFK's assassination.
Post by Salvador AstuciaSecond, about a year ago, I called several private investigators in
NYC and offered to *pay* them money to gather information on Perdomo.
They ALL refused.
Yes, no response is a response. "They ALL refused" - now where have I
heard that one before? :-D You've ruined your reputation years ago.
Private investigators can google too, you know.
Post by Salvador AstuciaThird, about a year ago, I contacted the Manhattan Office of District
Attorney Robert Morgenthau and requested eye-witness statements,
including Perdomo's, plus other bits of evidence against Chapman such
as crime scene photos. Morgenthau's office refused to supply anything.
His communication director indicated that everything related to
Chapman was sealed from public view.
Fourth, I recently contacted Brown, Harris, and Stevens, the real
estate firm that manages the Dakota now, and they managed it in Dec.
1980 when Lennon was killed. I spoke to their communication director
(who returned my call twice, by the way). I asked if BHS hired their
own security guards for their residential properties, or did they
contract companies who specialize in security services, like the
Wackenhut Corporation, for example, to provide security guards. The
communication director of BHS refused to supply any information
related to security unless I told her the nature of my research. At
that point I told her I was investigating the background of the
security guard on duty at the Dakota on the night Lennon was murdered;
however, I did NOT state Mr. Perdomo's name to anyone at BHS. I simply
asked them to tell me all they know about the stated security guard.
And I asked if the security guard was supplied by the Wackenhut
Corporation. BHS refused to answer those specific questions as well
after I gave them the requested information about the nature of my
research.
You'd be amazed if you knew how many people can google. You're a
well-known crackpot. Why would anyone waste their time with you?
Post by Salvador AstuciaFifth, I asked similar questions to a VP at the Wackenhut Corporation,
and he refused to cooperate.
Why should they co-operate? The piece of information that you requested
is not readily available. Somebody has to work to find that information.
The companies you mentioned are not charity organisations. Why would
they bother to find out some meaningless information, that probably
doesn't even exist, just to please a nut like you? Especially companies
that operate in security business don't want to be associated with you
in anyway.
Post by Salvador AstuciaAll I can do is ask questions, but if people refuse to answer, I am
forced to draw conclusions from their silence.
Who or what exactly forces you? Somehow you manage to draw the wrong
conclusions continuously. Don't you have the patience to wait until
actually do have some evidence?
= Dave Sharp
http://home.nyc.rr.com/whammo/david_sharp_faq.htm
